Ct. Rev.

Over 35 years ago, the Supreme Court established a two-step analysis in Chevron … In Kisor, the Supreme Court recently considered whether to overturn Auer and stop deferring to administrative interpretations of their own regulations.
The Chevron doctrine often shows up in judges’ opinions, or it may be debated by litigants embroiled in suits with any number of federal agencies. Supporters of deference to administrative agencies issued dire warnings that without deference … This page captures the main arguments that have been advanced in opposition to judicial deference as a doctrine. By Cyrus D. Mehta and Sonal Sharma* In Wilkie v.Kisor, the Supreme Court issued a significant decision regarding whether courts should still be paying deference to the government’s interpretation of its own regulations.Here’s some background on how we got to this deference standard. Scalia emphasized that courts should defer to administrative agencies, which are the agents of Congress.6 In doing so, Scalia was not just telling Congress what it (then) wanted to hear: as a Justice, Scalia was committed to this idea of deference. First, Kennedy J’s reasons in Pereira do not lend themselves to an unequivocal anti-Chevron reading. The Chevron Corporation was a party to the famous Supreme Court precedent increasing judicial deference to administrative agency's interpretations of federal law.

201, 242–44 (arguing Chevron should be limited … In a previous post I laid out some of the reasons to doubt the likely continued vitality of Chevron deference. The doctrine says that even if the agency's decision doesn't really make sense, a judge should still give deference and not interfere. There are certain situations that have arisen that designate when a judge should step in and rule an agency's action was wrong and should …

Close Then-Dean Kagan also expressed skepticism of Chevron, 35 35 David J. Barron & Elena Kagan, Chevron’s Nondelegation Doctrine, 2001 Sup. Judicial deference as a doctrine faces an uncertain future. Chevron deference may apply when an agency is interpreting statutes passed by Congress.

Until abolished by the voters in the last general election, the Florida analog to “ Chevron deference” was known simply as “agency deference.” The Florida prohibition of agency deference applies at every … By contrast, the deference standard discussed in this piece may apply when an agency is … The doctrine, established by the Court’s opinion in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., instructs that when reviewing certain agency interpretations of statutes, courts should … In this post, however, I develop some doubts about those doubts. What Do Judges Think of Chevron?
The U.S. Supreme Court has signaled a willingness to reexamine the scope of deference, and numerous states have narrowed deference or prohibited it altogether.

Deference doctrines such as Chevron and Auer continue to receive criticism from members of the judiciary including members of the Supreme Court. Although he suggested the “premises” underlying Chevron …

Scalia endorsed the Chevron doctrine… It appears that Justice Neil Gorsuch is far from the only one who questions the wisdom of Chevron deference and other findings from a new survey of …