Facts. 11–400 v. department of health and human services et al. The full text of Justice Thomas’ individual dissent in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, commonly known as the U.S. Supreme Court opinion narrowly upholding the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. 11–393 v. kathleen sebelius, secretary of health and human services, et al. One key part of … NFIB v. Sebelius Case Brief. National Federal of Independent Business et al.
11–398 v. florida et al. Full case name: National Federation of Independent Business, et al. florida, et al., petitioners. v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. The purpose of the ACA is to increase the number of Americans with healthcare insurance, and decrease the cost of healthcare. department of health and human services, et al., petitioners. national federation of independent business, et al., petitioners. v. Sebelius Case Brief - Rule of Law: The individual mandate portion of the Affordable Care Act, requiring individuals to purchase a health insurance policy providing a minimum level of coverage, is a tax and therefore does not violate the Constitution. Statement of the Facts: Congress enacted the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010.